- Tensions between Ruben Onsu and Sarwendah have escalated following a series of pointed exchanges on social media platform Threads.
- The dispute centers on child support payments, marital assets, and ongoing accusations surfacing in the wake of their divorce.
- The public feud has gone viral, drawing widespread reactions from netizens who are urging the former couple to resolve their differences for the sake of their children.
99 Tekno — The personal life of Ruben Onsu and Sarwendah has once again captured public attention, sparked by a series of cryptic social media posts that appear to be thinly veiled barbs aimed at one another. The brewing conflict has ignited heated discussions across digital platforms as users scramble to decode the messages behind their latest interactions.
The situation escalated significantly when the former couple took their grievances to Threads. The core of the dispute remains contentious, involving the cessation of child support payments by Ruben Onsu since December 2025, the status of marital property currently held as collateral for bank debt, and mutual accusations regarding who is responsible for the ongoing friction.
Sarwendah initiated the exchange with a reflective yet biting statement. The Thai-descended celebrity emphasized the importance of living a clean life, focusing on children’s needs, and working hard without accumulating debt.
“Starting life with a clean heart without hurting others, focusing on life and facts; children have many needs, it is better to focus on working hard without going into debt,” Sarwendah wrote, as quoted by Kompas.com on Monday (6/1/2026). She also alluded to marital values, stating that shielding a husband’s secrets was a duty she upheld during their marriage. “In any religion, covering a husband’s faults during marriage is an act of worship; I was simply fulfilling my obligations as a wife,” she added.
The post drew an emotional response from Sarwendah’s sister, Wendy Lo, who entered the fray to defend her sibling. Ruben Onsu did not remain silent, firing back with a sharp retort that directly addressed Wendy, accusing her of exacerbating the situation.
“Now the sister is getting angry on her own. Hey, you main instigator, don’t get angry—you are one of the key people fueling this. You are busy digging for information everywhere; try focusing on finding other work instead of always focusing on my house. I’m not afraid; why would I be afraid of someone who makes a living off my sweat?” Ruben retorted.
This exchange quickly went viral, prompting a wave of reactions from netizens. While some have fueled the debate, many others have expressed disappointment, hoping the two can settle their disputes amicably for the well-being of their children.
For context, Ruben Onsu and Sarwendah were officially divorced on September 24, 2024, following a default judgment by the South Jakarta District Court. Custody of their three children was granted to Sarwendah, as Ruben’s petition focused solely on the divorce. Post-divorce, Ruben stated that he had been providing 225 million rupiah per month for his children, but claimed he stopped the payments after facing difficulties in accessing them. Conversely, Sarwendah’s camp has alleged that they have been approached by debt collectors due to outstanding debts held by Ruben.
(TribunNewsmaker.com/TribunnewsBogor.com)
Summary
The public conflict between Ruben Onsu and Sarwendah has intensified following a series of heated exchanges on the social media platform Threads. The dispute involves serious allegations regarding the cessation of child support payments, the status of marital assets, and mutual blame for their ongoing friction. Sarwendah has publicly criticized Ruben’s financial conduct, while Ruben has accused her family of fueling the tension.
This viral feud has sparked significant concern among netizens, many of whom are urging the former couple to resolve their differences for the sake of their children. Since their divorce in September 2024, the situation has been complicated by claims of outstanding debt and difficulties in communication. Public discourse continues as observers monitor how these financial and personal grievances will be addressed moving forward.